Personal tools

Ineffective Technological Protection Measure

From GPLv3 Wiki

Revision as of 01:25, 4 March 2006; view current revision
←Older revision | Newer revision→

What if some foreign court comes up with a definition of a UCB ("Unproductive Copyright Boondoggle") which they outlaw, only to claim that it is not the same thing as an "Effective Technological Protection Measure" as defined in the DMCA?

How can the ETPM clause of the GPL v3 be made general enough to counter this threat?

Retrieved from "http://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index.php/Ineffective_Technological_Protection_Measure"

Views

Current License Draft

: Read the GPLv3; Read the LGPLv3; Read and comment on the current AGPL draft; Read and comment on the GFDL and GSFDL drafts; Support the process

Search

Toolbox

Content is available under GNU Free Documentation License 1.2.
About GPLv3 Wiki
Disclaimers

By contributing to any page on this wiki, you agree to assign copyright for your contribution to the Free Software Foundation. The Free Software Foundation promises to always use either a verbatim copying license or a free documentation license when publishing your contribution.

We grant you back all your rights under copyright, including the rights to copy, modify, and redistribute your contributions.