Process
From GPLv3 Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 15:07, 17 January 2006 213.55.30.50 (Talk | contribs) addressing license consideration spotted after save ← Previous diff |
Current revision garrison (Talk | contribs) added committee B members |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| This is where the [http://gplv3.fsf.org/gpl3-process.pdf drafting and comment process] itself will be discussed. The content is technical and administrative, rather than political. | This is where the [http://gplv3.fsf.org/gpl3-process.pdf drafting and comment process] itself will be discussed. The content is technical and administrative, rather than political. | ||
| - | * Who are the mysterious committees A, B, C, D and E at present? | + | == Who are the people on the committees? == |
| - | * Why has the GPLv3 Process been modelled on the terrible processes of the WGIG, instead of harnessing the free-software-friendly organisations already existing around the world? | + | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/A/committee-A-bios Committee A members] |
| - | (The above questions should be regarded as released under a MIT/X11-style permission to use for any purpose, not the GPL-incompatible FDL 1.2. I don't require any journalists wanting to use these questions to include the full FDL.) | + | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/B/memberlist Committee B members] |
| + | |||
| + | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/C/memberlist-public Committee C members] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/D/members Committee D members] | ||
Current revision
This is where the drafting and comment process itself will be discussed. The content is technical and administrative, rather than political.
[edit]
