Personal tools

Process

From GPLv3 Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 15:04, 17 January 2006
213.55.30.50 (Talk | contribs)
First questions.
← Previous diff
Revision as of 15:07, 17 January 2006
213.55.30.50 (Talk | contribs)
addressing license consideration spotted after save
Next diff →
Line 4: Line 4:
* Why has the GPLv3 Process been modelled on the terrible processes of the WGIG, instead of harnessing the free-software-friendly organisations already existing around the world? * Why has the GPLv3 Process been modelled on the terrible processes of the WGIG, instead of harnessing the free-software-friendly organisations already existing around the world?
 +
 +(The above questions should be regarded as released under a MIT/X11-style permission to use for any purpose, not the GPL-incompatible FDL 1.2. I don't require any journalists wanting to use these questions to include the full FDL.)

Revision as of 15:07, 17 January 2006

This is where the drafting and comment process itself will be discussed. The content is technical and administrative, rather than political.

  • Who are the mysterious committees A, B, C, D and E at present?
  • Why has the GPLv3 Process been modelled on the terrible processes of the WGIG, instead of harnessing the free-software-friendly organisations already existing around the world?

(The above questions should be regarded as released under a MIT/X11-style permission to use for any purpose, not the GPL-incompatible FDL 1.2. I don't require any journalists wanting to use these questions to include the full FDL.)