Process
From GPLv3 Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 22:28, 29 January 2006 70.239.64.133 (Talk | contribs) revert spam ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 22:29, 1 March 2006 johns (Talk | contribs) Removed licensing notice. If this is a problem, the contributor should contact us, but since it was contributed under an MIT license, I'll assume it's ok. Next diff → |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| * Why has the GPLv3 Process been modelled on the terrible processes of the WGIG, instead of harnessing the free-software-friendly organisations already existing around the world? | * Why has the GPLv3 Process been modelled on the terrible processes of the WGIG, instead of harnessing the free-software-friendly organisations already existing around the world? | ||
| - | |||
| - | (The above questions should be regarded as released under a MIT/X11-style permission to use for any purpose, not the GPL-incompatible FDL 1.2. I don't require any journalists wanting to use these questions to include the full FDL.) | ||
Revision as of 22:29, 1 March 2006
This is where the drafting and comment process itself will be discussed. The content is technical and administrative, rather than political.
Who are the people on the committees?
The committee lists haven't been announced yet because they're not finalized. They should be within two to three weeks -- around early February -- and will be published at that time.
Other questions
- Why has the GPLv3 Process been modelled on the terrible processes of the WGIG, instead of harnessing the free-software-friendly organisations already existing around the world?
