This website is an archive. It was used for drafting and public consultation on GPLv3 and version 3 of other GNU licenses which were published in 2007. For up to date information, see https://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html. For more information about this archive, see https://www.fsf.org/licensing/gplv3-archive

From GPLv3 Wiki

This statement was on the original page "(p.s. this text is in the public domain, since I don't like the GNU Non-Free Documentation License)". I'm afraid that's not possible here; we need all contributions to be licenseable under the GFDL, and for copyright to be assigned to the FSF. I've removed this statement. The original contribution may need to be removed as well, if this is disagreeable to the contributor. --johns 16:55, 1 February 2006 (EST)

so why not doubble licencing?: GFDL/public domain: this would be possible if only all users's edit on this page is also doubble licencied tuxcar 00:11, 11 April 2006 (EDT)