Personal tools

Talk:News articles

From GPLv3 Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 20:49, 26 October 2006
jjvt (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 00:10, 28 October 2006
Ownut (Talk | contribs)
Request for withdrawal of article
Next diff →
Line 2: Line 2:
The [http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2006/1030/104_print.html Forbes article] contains very biased opinions if not lies. It's likely to cause confusion. [http://www.linuxtechdaily.com/2006/10/stallman-gplv3-attack-by-forbes-is-ridiculous/ This article] could be added as it's response to it, but I'm not sure if it's relevant. Maybe they should both be here, maybe neither should be here. Or maybe there should be separate section for FUD. I'll let someone else deside. -- jjvt The [http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2006/1030/104_print.html Forbes article] contains very biased opinions if not lies. It's likely to cause confusion. [http://www.linuxtechdaily.com/2006/10/stallman-gplv3-attack-by-forbes-is-ridiculous/ This article] could be added as it's response to it, but I'm not sure if it's relevant. Maybe they should both be here, maybe neither should be here. Or maybe there should be separate section for FUD. I'll let someone else deside. -- jjvt
 +
 +== Request for withdrawal of article ==
 +
 +Most of the reaction on the Forbe's forum is very good, but make sure you read the post near the bottom entitled ''''Request for withdrawal of article'''' which is filled with agreement and claims that it borders on ''libel''. It is very entertaining, and some of the comments are quite involved.
 +
 +* http://forums.forbes.com/forbes/board/message?board.id=stallmanreaction&message.id=8
 +* http://forums.forbes.com/forbes/board?board.id=stallmanreaction

Revision as of 00:10, 28 October 2006

Forbes article and FUD

The Forbes article contains very biased opinions if not lies. It's likely to cause confusion. This article could be added as it's response to it, but I'm not sure if it's relevant. Maybe they should both be here, maybe neither should be here. Or maybe there should be separate section for FUD. I'll let someone else deside. -- jjvt

Request for withdrawal of article

Most of the reaction on the Forbe's forum is very good, but make sure you read the post near the bottom entitled 'Request for withdrawal of article' which is filled with agreement and claims that it borders on libel. It is very entertaining, and some of the comments are quite involved.