Personal tools

Talk:Test Cases

From GPLv3 Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 19:35, 4 July 2006
julli9 (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision
stefie10 (Talk | contribs)

Line 1: Line 1:
-<div id="nolabel" style="overflow:auto;height:1px;">+These are good comments. Please put them in [http://gplv3.fsf.org/comments the comment system]; that way, they can be reviewed by discussion committees and considered appropriately.
 +Since these should be moved to the comments system, I'm removing the link here from the front page. Please empty these pages once the comments have been submitted.
-[http://www.action-meds.com cheap butalbital]+Thanks for your feedback and your help.
-[http://www.5stardrugs.com buy tramadol]+
-[http://www.24-7pills.net tramadol online]+
-[http://www.american-meds.net butalbital discount]+
-[http://www.amazing-pills.com butalbital cheap] +
-buy tramadol online. online tramadol from our pharmacy, taking tramadol buy information tramadol, side effects tramadol, purchase tramadol online. cod online tramadol, tramadol india, cheap tramadol online, tramadol online, pharmacy online store +
-tramadol 50 mg. low price tramadol, tramadol pain treatment - tramadol hcl 50? - 120 tramadol. tramadol sales, buying cod tramado l, tramadol for humans, cheap tramadol online, overdose tramadol. order tramadol pictured tramadol pill tramadol seizure. cod tramadol cod, tramadol pdr, order pharmacy tramadol. buy prescription tramadol drug tramadol - tramadol side. +
-is tramadol a, order tramadol online, tramadol hcl, tramadol drug test .tramadol uses order tramadol overnight paypal tramadol +
-tramadol com tramadol tablets tramadol no perscription remove tramadol.+
-[http://20six.co.uk/cheaptramadol cheap tramadol]+
-[http://20six.co.uk/ordertramadol order tramadol]+
-[http://20six.co.uk/onlinetramadol1 online tramadol]+
-[http://20six.co.uk/tramadolonline tramadol online]+
-[http://20six.co.uk/tramadoldiscount tramadol discount]+
-[http://20six.co.uk/purchasetramadol purchase tramadol]+
-[http://20six.co.uk/ordersoma order soma]+
-[http://20six.co.uk/onlinesoma1 online soma]+
-[http://20six.co.uk/online-viagra online viagea]+
-[http://20six.co.uk/orderviagra order viagra]+
-[http://20six.co.uk/cheapviagraonline cheap viagra online]+
-[http://20six.co.uk/purchaseviagra purchase viagra]+
-[http://20six.co.uk/cheap-ultram cheap ultram]+
-[http://spaces.msn.com/cheap-tramadol/ cheap tramadol]+--[[User:brett|brett]] 17:09, 21 January 2006 (EST)
-[http://spaces.msn.com/buy-viagra/ buy viagra]+
-SEO: UndoneHeaven 
-[http://www.replicahours.com rolex replica]+I think this sort of information is better suited to a wiki. I thought of this page not as comments on the license but rather as a way of understanding the license by characterizing its real-world behavior. It's not intended to be opinion, but fact: it tries to document what the license actually does in a series of situations. (Or what possible things it might do when there is ambiguity.) It's a way to guard against regressions in the license: when a change that fixes a problem raised by one comment breaks something else. If we can capture most or all of the interesting GPL situations here, someone can check each one for each draft and feel confident that nothing slipped through the cracks. If it is buried in comments, it becomes much more difficult to check. As I write this, there are 451 comments on the draft, which are only organized by order of submission. I have faith that the committees will review them, but will they go back and read all the comments and apply them to each successive draft, to make sure that everything still works as expected? And will people not on the committee check it as well? I think distilling it into test cases converts it to a form that people are more likely to use both to understand and fix the license.
-[http://www.replicahours.com/index.php?cPath=51_25 fake rolex daydate]+
-[http://www.replicahours.com/index.php?cPath=29 replica swiss]+
-[http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&ie=UTF-8&q=replicahours replicahours]+
-buy replica cheap best price rolex discounf fake. watches fake watch online store using paypal fedex rolex replicahours. order rolex replica now. cheap wholesale fake rolex online free shipping. 80% discount rolex replica and replicas watches. woman how to adjust a chronometer watch authorized rolex dealer, rolex watches rolex dial rolex oyster perpetual date reloj panerai replica en usa rolex watches serial numbers rolex woman daytona daytona watch replica panerai watch rolex 50th anniversary rolex daytona paul newman replica rolex buy rolex watches. ladies rolex yachtmaster white dial faux. rolex daytona manual cellini rolex for sale pictures of rolex oyster perpetual datejust rolex rolex gmt-master ii buying rolex on line fake rolex daytona gold on silver how to tell fake tag rolex oyster perpetual new tell. Replica rolex? Swiss made replica rolex watch! Cost does fake much rolex rolex presidential rolex. Rolex dials rolex sea dweller. Rolex tudor fake rolex turkey datejust oyster perpetual rolex man rolex submariner cosmograph daytona oyster professional rolex? Datejust rolex rolex replica rolex fake rolexes for sale. Rolex submariner for sale, rolex yachtmaster! Explorer ii rolex preowned rolex watch? Cheap rolex watch, rolex daytona 116520 forum rolex. 18k gold replica ex part rolex daytona review rolex submariner 50 anniversary rolex cellini replica rolex watch fake rolex omega?+
-[http://www.customsoftwarenow.com custom software development]+I don't mean to suggest that comments are bad in themselves - I think the comment interface is extremely well done, and it is well suited to expressing opinions about the license or to discuss the details of the wording. I think that a set of test cases complements that interface rather than replacing it.
-Software Development, custom software development, offshore software development, outsourcing software development+
-[http://www.thepublish.com press release]+--[[User:stefie10|stefie10]] 18:37, 25 January 2006 (EST)
-press release, articles, business directory, ezines, classifieds, job search,business free b2b search advertising aerospace defense agriculture airlines automotive chemicals computers electronics semiconductors energy utilities +
- +
-[http://www.ez-agents.com wholesale atv]+
-</div>+

Current revision

These are good comments. Please put them in the comment system; that way, they can be reviewed by discussion committees and considered appropriately.

Since these should be moved to the comments system, I'm removing the link here from the front page. Please empty these pages once the comments have been submitted.

Thanks for your feedback and your help.

--brett 17:09, 21 January 2006 (EST)


I think this sort of information is better suited to a wiki. I thought of this page not as comments on the license but rather as a way of understanding the license by characterizing its real-world behavior. It's not intended to be opinion, but fact: it tries to document what the license actually does in a series of situations. (Or what possible things it might do when there is ambiguity.) It's a way to guard against regressions in the license: when a change that fixes a problem raised by one comment breaks something else. If we can capture most or all of the interesting GPL situations here, someone can check each one for each draft and feel confident that nothing slipped through the cracks. If it is buried in comments, it becomes much more difficult to check. As I write this, there are 451 comments on the draft, which are only organized by order of submission. I have faith that the committees will review them, but will they go back and read all the comments and apply them to each successive draft, to make sure that everything still works as expected? And will people not on the committee check it as well? I think distilling it into test cases converts it to a form that people are more likely to use both to understand and fix the license.

I don't mean to suggest that comments are bad in themselves - I think the comment interface is extremely well done, and it is well suited to expressing opinions about the license or to discuss the details of the wording. I think that a set of test cases complements that interface rather than replacing it.

--stefie10 18:37, 25 January 2006 (EST)