Personal tools

User talk:brett

From GPLv3 Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 17:20, 23 March 2006
sirian (Talk | contribs)
Does the GPL allow me to require that anyone who receives the software must pay me a fee and/or notify me?
← Previous diff
Revision as of 21:46, 25 March 2006
brett (Talk | contribs)
clean-up and reply
Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
-Hi - I posted to the discussion page of [[Test_Cases]]: [[Talk:Test_Cases]] in response to your comment. I'm posting a note here to let you know. (The default configuration of the wiki appears to send email when posts are made to this page.) 
- 
---[[User:stefie10|stefie10]] 13:24, 26 January 2006 (EST) 
- 
== Does the GPL allow me to require that anyone who receives the software must pay me a fee and/or notify me? == == Does the GPL allow me to require that anyone who receives the software must pay me a fee and/or notify me? ==
I agree 100%, and had a go at reducing it. I quoted "additional restrictions" to signal that that phrase has special meaning. The question you offered seems closely related to "Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the GPL? Could the developer's actions ever be a violation of the GPL?" so I added it with a little of the text I removed from the reduced section. [[User:sirian|sirian]] 12:20, 23 March 2006 (EST) I agree 100%, and had a go at reducing it. I quoted "additional restrictions" to signal that that phrase has special meaning. The question you offered seems closely related to "Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the GPL? Could the developer's actions ever be a violation of the GPL?" so I added it with a little of the text I removed from the reduced section. [[User:sirian|sirian]] 12:20, 23 March 2006 (EST)
 +
 +:Thanks; this looks great. I added some explanatory links, and tried to tighten up the wording in one paragraph. It'd be great if you could review what I did and make sure I didn't lose any information you were trying to get across. --[[User:brett|brett]] 16:46, 25 March 2006 (EST)

Revision as of 21:46, 25 March 2006

Does the GPL allow me to require that anyone who receives the software must pay me a fee and/or notify me?

I agree 100%, and had a go at reducing it. I quoted "additional restrictions" to signal that that phrase has special meaning. The question you offered seems closely related to "Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the GPL? Could the developer's actions ever be a violation of the GPL?" so I added it with a little of the text I removed from the reduced section. sirian 12:20, 23 March 2006 (EST)

Thanks; this looks great. I added some explanatory links, and tried to tighten up the wording in one paragraph. It'd be great if you could review what I did and make sure I didn't lose any information you were trying to get across. --brett 16:46, 25 March 2006 (EST)