[Committee-d] GPLv3 Last Call - Suggestions for AGPLv3

[Bradley M. Kuhn]

rufo guerreschi <rg at partecs.com> writes:

> Why is it mentioning a version 3?  What happened to 2? Is 2 going to be
> a drafty version to pass around in order to make v3 really kickass?

>From what I understand, the decision was to call AGPL "version 3" so that
the version numbers are synchronized.


I believe a draft of AGPLv3 will be circulated eventually; for the moment,
everyone is focused on getting GPLv3 squared away.
-- 

   -- bkuhn