Process
From GPLv3 Wiki
Revision as of 15:04, 17 January 2006 213.55.30.50 (Talk | contribs) First questions. ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 15:07, 17 January 2006 213.55.30.50 (Talk | contribs) addressing license consideration spotted after save Next diff → |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Why has the GPLv3 Process been modelled on the terrible processes of the WGIG, instead of harnessing the free-software-friendly organisations already existing around the world? | * Why has the GPLv3 Process been modelled on the terrible processes of the WGIG, instead of harnessing the free-software-friendly organisations already existing around the world? | ||
+ | |||
+ | (The above questions should be regarded as released under a MIT/X11-style permission to use for any purpose, not the GPL-incompatible FDL 1.2. I don't require any journalists wanting to use these questions to include the full FDL.) |
Revision as of 15:07, 17 January 2006
This is where the drafting and comment process itself will be discussed. The content is technical and administrative, rather than political.
- Who are the mysterious committees A, B, C, D and E at present?
- Why has the GPLv3 Process been modelled on the terrible processes of the WGIG, instead of harnessing the free-software-friendly organisations already existing around the world?
(The above questions should be regarded as released under a MIT/X11-style permission to use for any purpose, not the GPL-incompatible FDL 1.2. I don't require any journalists wanting to use these questions to include the full FDL.)