Process
From GPLv3 Wiki
Revision as of 11:58, 2 March 2006 ciaran (Talk | contribs) Other questions - clarified my request for clarity ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 22:59, 13 March 2006 johns (Talk | contribs) Added link to Committee A member list. Next diff → |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Who are the people on the committees? == | == Who are the people on the committees? == | ||
- | The committee lists haven't been announced yet because they're not finalized. They should be within two to three weeks -- around early February -- and will be published at that time. | + | The committee lists are being gradually published. |
+ | |||
+ | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/A/committee-A-bios Committee A members] | ||
== Other questions == | == Other questions == |
Revision as of 22:59, 13 March 2006
This is where the drafting and comment process itself will be discussed. The content is technical and administrative, rather than political.
Who are the people on the committees?
The committee lists are being gradually published.
Other questions
Why has the GPLv3 Process been modelled on the terrible processes of the WGIG, instead of harnessing the free-software-friendly organisations already existing around the world?
- Can the author explain this question in terms of the GPLv3 consultation process, instead of in terms of references to other processes which readers may not know or may understand differently?