Process
From GPLv3 Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 22:29, 1 March 2006 johns (Talk | contribs) Removed licensing notice. If this is a problem, the contributor should contact us, but since it was contributed under an MIT license, I'll assume it's ok. ← Previous diff |
Current revision garrison (Talk | contribs) added committee B members |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| == Who are the people on the committees? == | == Who are the people on the committees? == | ||
| - | The committee lists haven't been announced yet because they're not finalized. They should be within two to three weeks -- around early February -- and will be published at that time. | + | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/A/committee-A-bios Committee A members] |
| - | == Other questions == | + | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/B/memberlist Committee B members] |
| - | * Why has the GPLv3 Process been modelled on the terrible processes of the WGIG, instead of harnessing the free-software-friendly organisations already existing around the world? | + | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/C/memberlist-public Committee C members] |
| + | |||
| + | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/D/members Committee D members] | ||
Current revision
This is where the drafting and comment process itself will be discussed. The content is technical and administrative, rather than political.
[edit]
