Regarding the text:illegally invade users' privacy In section: gpl3.drm.p0.s3 Submitted by: pitrouon 2006-04-29 at 15:26 EDT
0 agree:
noted by pitrouon 2006-04-29 at 15:26 EDT:
By making a reference to local law about privacy, you are making the application of the GPLv3 internationally uncertain.
Indeed, making a reference to privacy law makes the GPLv3 step outside of the frame of the Berne Convention on author rights.
Therefore the "illegally invade users'privacy" wording should be avoided.
I think a clear definition of DRM is:
- a mode of distribution
- that grants some of the rights present in the license while deliberately forbidding others
This is more or less what the second part of your sentence says.
Comment 1125: internationally dangerous
This Comment is part of the discussion on:#1129: (fontana) Violates principle of no discrimination against fields of use
This Comment is part of the discussion on:
#1132: (fontana) Concerns regarding differing definitions in different countries
Regarding the text:
In section: gpl3.drm.p0.s3
Submitted by: pitrou on 2006-04-29 at 15:26 EDT
0 agree:
noted by pitrou on 2006-04-29 at 15:26 EDT:
collapse children