[Committee-d] DRM and Allowing Authentication Draft
Don Armstrong
don at donarmstrong.com
Sun Mar 12 18:05:27 EST 2006
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, jesse wrote:
> > codes and retain identical functioning need not be provided, so long
> > as you can generate the codes or obtain them at no cost to you. A code
>
> Having been absent a bunch lately, I could easily be misreading or
> rehashing. If I am, tell me to go RTFLogs ;)
>
> "obtain them at no cost to you" seems to suggest that a vendor could
> provide them gratis as long as the feel like complying, but that if
> they go belly up or have a change of heart, the public could lose.
This is also a problem with sourcecode as well... so I'm not sure if
there's anything that we can do about it.
I was really trying to address the issue where the key infrastructure
requires you to purchase a multithousand dollar key from a CA, and
perhaps in some cases have an insurance policy current for a few
million dollars to cover misuse of your key. [Such a key would be
"available"]
Don Armstrong
--
A citizen of America will cross the ocean to fight for democracy, but
won't cross the street to vote in a national election.
-- Bill Vaughan
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
More information about the Committee-D
mailing list