Process
From GPLv3 Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 22:28, 29 January 2006 70.239.64.133 (Talk | contribs) revert spam ← Previous diff |
Current revision garrison (Talk | contribs) added committee B members |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Who are the people on the committees? == | == Who are the people on the committees? == | ||
- | The committee lists haven't been announced yet because they're not finalized. They should be within two to three weeks -- around early February -- and will be published at that time. | + | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/A/committee-A-bios Committee A members] |
- | == Other questions == | + | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/B/memberlist Committee B members] |
- | * Why has the GPLv3 Process been modelled on the terrible processes of the WGIG, instead of harnessing the free-software-friendly organisations already existing around the world? | + | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/C/memberlist-public Committee C members] |
- | (The above questions should be regarded as released under a MIT/X11-style permission to use for any purpose, not the GPL-incompatible FDL 1.2. I don't require any journalists wanting to use these questions to include the full FDL.) | + | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/D/members Committee D members] |
Current revision
This is where the drafting and comment process itself will be discussed. The content is technical and administrative, rather than political.
[edit]