Process
From GPLv3 Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 20:51, 20 March 2006 novalis (Talk | contribs) Who are the people on the committees? ← Previous diff |
Current revision garrison (Talk | contribs) added committee B members |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Who are the people on the committees? == | == Who are the people on the committees? == | ||
- | |||
- | The committee lists are being gradually published. | ||
[http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/A/committee-A-bios Committee A members] | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/A/committee-A-bios Committee A members] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/B/memberlist Committee B members] | ||
[http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/C/memberlist-public Committee C members] | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/C/memberlist-public Committee C members] | ||
[http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/D/members Committee D members] | [http://gplv3.fsf.org/discussion-committees/D/members Committee D members] | ||
- | |||
- | == Other questions == | ||
- | |||
- | Why has the GPLv3 Process been modelled on the terrible processes of the WGIG, instead of harnessing the free-software-friendly organisations already existing around the world? | ||
- | |||
- | :Can the author explain this question in terms of the GPLv3 consultation process, instead of in terms of references to other processes which readers may not know or may understand differently? |
Current revision
This is where the drafting and comment process itself will be discussed. The content is technical and administrative, rather than political.
[edit]